U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Mauricio Weber v. Corporal Santos

Mauricio Weber v. Corporal Santos
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 2014

Mauricio Weber v. Corporal Santos

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6783

MAURICIO E. WEBER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CORPORAL SANTOS, Defendant – Appellee, and CAPTAIN ARLETTE JONES; LIEUTENANT HANKINS; CAPTAIN HAM; LIEUTENANT COLLINS; OFFICER REEVES; CORPORAL RHONDA LATIMER; MAJOR GARRY L. BRYANT; OFFICER ASHE; DEPUTY HOLDEN; LIEUTENANT HAYDEN; LIEUTENANT LOOPER; SERGEANT TRIBBLE, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:12-cv-03349-TMC)

Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mauricio E. Weber, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action asserting civil rights and state law claims for failure to prosecute. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Weber’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Weber has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Weber’s motions for stay pending appeal, injunctive relief, and a restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.