U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Gary Williams v. Carl Eason

Gary Williams v. Carl Eason
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 2014

Gary Williams v. Carl Eason

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6684

GARY B. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CARL EASON, State Judge, Suffolk Circuit Court, Mr.; GREGORY K. MATTHEWS, Attorney at law, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:13-cv-00493-HEH)

Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Buterra Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Eason, No. 3:13-cv-00493-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.