U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Michael Grooms

United States v. Michael Grooms
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2014

United States v. Michael Grooms

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7881

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MICHAEL MONROE GROOMS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cr-01174-CMC-1)

Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 2, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan M. Milling, MILLING LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Nathan S. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Monroe Grooms appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Grooms, No. 3:09-cr-01174-CMC-1 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 23 & entered Oct. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.