U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Carl Hopkins

United States v. Carl Hopkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 11, 2014

United States v. Carl Hopkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7814

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CARL ERIC HOPKINS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:02-cr-00540-JFA-1)

Submitted: April 11, 2014 Decided: September 11, 2014

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Eric Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Carl Eric Hopkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hopkins, No. 3:02-cr-00540-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2013). We deny Hopkins' motion to appoint/assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.