U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Hudson City Savings Bank v. David Mattis

Hudson City Savings Bank v. David Mattis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 29, 2014

Hudson City Savings Bank v. David Mattis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1478

HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK; JOSHUA R. PINYAN, Substitute Trustee; GRADY I. INGLE, Substitute Trustee; ELIZABETH B.

ELLS, Substitute Trustee, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. DAVID M. MATTIS, Defendant - Appellant, and MARGARET A. MATTIS, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00030-BO)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Mattis, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Kenneth Purser, SHAPIRO & INGLE LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: David M. Mattis seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding the underlying foreclosure action to North Carolina state court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012); see E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 581-83 (4th Cir. 2013). Because the district court’s order does not fall within any of the exceptions provided by § 1447, the order is not appealable. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.