United States v. Mark Clifton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mark Clifton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6755

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARK CLIFTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:96-cr-00062-H-2)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Clifton, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark Clifton appeals the district court’s order

denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and his

supplemental petition alternatively seeking relief pursuant to a

writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Clifton, No. 7:96-cr-

00062-H-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished