John Woods v. The Boeing Company
John Woods v. The Boeing Company
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2455
JOHN WOODS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:11-cv-02855-RMG)
Submitted: September 26, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald L. Gilliard, Joseph R. Hennell, THE LAW OFFICE OF GERALD L. GILLIARD, ESQ., LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Cherie W. Blackburn, Michael P. Scott, NEXSEN PRUET, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Woods appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer on his claims that the employer failed to accommodate his disabilities and discharged him in retaliation for requesting such accommodations, and he appeals the order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woods v. The Boeing Co., No. 2:11-cv-02855-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2013; Oct. 30, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.