John Woods v. The Boeing Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

John Woods v. The Boeing Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2455

JOHN WOODS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE BOEING COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:11-cv-02855-RMG)

Submitted: September 26, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald L. Gilliard, Joseph R. Hennell, THE LAW OFFICE OF GERALD L. GILLIARD, ESQ., LLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Cherie W. Blackburn, Michael P. Scott, NEXSEN PRUET, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Woods appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to his former employer on his claims that the

employer failed to accommodate his disabilities and discharged

him in retaliation for requesting such accommodations, and he

appeals the order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We

have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Woods v. The Boeing Co.,

No. 2:11-cv-02855-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2013; Oct. 30, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished