U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Malik Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP

Malik Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2014

Malik Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1378

MALIK BEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01562-PWG)

Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: October 6, 2014

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malik Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Bizhan Beiramee, Alexander Richard Green, MCGINNIS WUTSCHER BEIRAMEE, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland; Craig James Franco, ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Malik Bey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692y (2012), the Maryland Consumer Debt Collections Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 14-201 to -204, and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 13-101 to -501, and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, No. 8:13-cv-01562-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 20 & Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.