U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Reginald Stewart v. United States

Reginald Stewart v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2014

Reginald Stewart v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1306

REGINALD B. STEWART, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee, and CELINA M. INMAN; VALERIE A. HUTTON, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13- cv-03610-PWG)

Submitted: September 22, 2014 Decided: October 8, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eden Brown Gaines, BROWN GAINES, LLC, White Plains, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Victor M. Lawrence, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Reginald B. Stewart appeals the district court’s order denying his request for limited discovery and dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. United States, No. 8:13-cv-03610-PWG (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.