George Hood v. Tracy Johns

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

George Hood v. Tracy Johns

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6664

GEORGE ALBERT HOOD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TRACY W. JOHNS; ANDRES HERNANDEZ; KAREN STEINOUR; FREDDIE GARRIDO; ANDREA TAYLOR; UNIT MANAGER WEAVER; MARGRET HALE; LIEUTENANT BELL; LIEUTENANT FERNANDEZ; OFFICER SMITH; OFFICER RUFFIN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03072-FL)

Submitted: September 29, 2014 Decided: October 16, 2014

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Albert Hood, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Albert Hood appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Hood v. Johns, No. 5:11-ct-03072-FL (E.D.N.C.

Mar. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished