George Hood v. Tracy Johns
George Hood v. Tracy Johns
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6664
GEORGE ALBERT HOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRACY W. JOHNS; ANDRES HERNANDEZ; KAREN STEINOUR; FREDDIE GARRIDO; ANDREA TAYLOR; UNIT MANAGER WEAVER; MARGRET HALE; LIEUTENANT BELL; LIEUTENANT FERNANDEZ; OFFICER SMITH; OFFICER RUFFIN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03072-FL)
Submitted: September 29, 2014 Decided: October 16, 2014
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Albert Hood, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: George Albert Hood appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hood v. Johns, No. 5:11-ct-03072-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.