Roger Morse v. VDOC

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Roger Morse v. VDOC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1399

ROGER LEE MORSE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CLAUDIA FARR, Director for the Department of Employment Dispute; N.H. SCOTT, a/k/a Cookie, Deputy Director Administration; PAUL BROUGHTON, Human Resources Director; RUFUS FLEMING, Eastern Region Administrator Director; GARY BASS, Central Regional Administrator Director; DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden; LORETTA KELLY, Warden; AL BASKERVILLE, Warden Powhatan Correctional Center; HARRY DIGGS, JR., Warden Deep Meadow Correction; MARIE VARGO, Warden Sussex II State Prison; WILLIAM S. BREED, Human Resources Manager; MACK A. BAILEY, Major Correctional Officer; WILLIAM THEACHEY, Captain Correctional Center; ANTHONY COKELEY, Captain Correctional Center; CLYDE WRIGHT, Lieutenant Correctional Center; DICHILLE WILLIAMS, Lieutenant; LETHA R. HITE, Human Resources Officer; HAROLD CLARKE, Current Director of Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

GENE M. JOHNSON, Previous Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections; RONALD J. ANGELONE, Previous Director of Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-00361-REP) Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Lee Morse, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Rose McNeill, Assistant Attorney General, George William Norris, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Morse appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Morse’s motion to

waive filing fees and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Morse v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr., No.

3:13-cv-00361-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2014). We deny Morse’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished