Latasha Askins v. Starting Point

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Latasha Askins v. Starting Point

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1844

LATASHA LORRAINE ASKINS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

STARTING POINT; HEATHER QUENAULT; MARIA ROUNDTREE; LARRY WISEBURN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:12-cv-03547-RBH)

Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latasha Lorraine Askins, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Edward Justice, Jr., Joseph Jakob Kennedy, TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Latasha Lorraine Askins appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Askins’

complaint alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Askins v.

Starting Point, No. 4:12-cv-03547-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 2014).

We also deny Askins’ motion to assign counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished