John Barnes v. Artex Fine Art Services
John Barnes v. Artex Fine Art Services
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1692
JOHN M. BARNES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARTEX FINE ART SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:14-cv-00040-RWT)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John M. Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, Alex Chad Weinstein, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
John M. Barnes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint alleging age discrimination as untimely
and for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant
Barnes leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Artex Fine Art
Servs., No. 8:14-cv-00040-RWT (D. Md. filed June 9, 2014;
entered June 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished