Carol Pizzuto v. Scott Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Carol Pizzuto v. Scott Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1534

CAROL L. GRAY PIZZUTO,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SCOTT R. SMITH; KEITH C. GAMBLE; STEPHEN M. FOWLER; D. LUKE FURBEE; OFFICER S. A. ZIMMERMAN; OFFICER D. L. ROBINSON; HONORABLE JAMES P. MAZZONE; HONORABLE ARTHUR M. RECHT; HONORABLE RONALD E. WILSON; KENNETH W. BLAKE; JULIE L. KREEFER; TONI VANCAMP, individually and collectively,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES)

Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol L. Gray Pizzuto, Appellant Pro Se. Diane G. Senakievich, David Lee Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia; Stephen Mark Fowler, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Kenneth Louis Hopper, PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Deva A. Solomon, Monte Lee Williams, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia; John Michael Hedges, Teresa Jean Lyons, HEDGES LYONS & SHEPHERD, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carol L. Gray Pizzuto appeals the district court’s

orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on her

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Pizzuto v. Smith, No. 5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va.

July 1, 2013 & May 22, 2014). We deny Pizzuto’s motion to file

electronic media. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished