U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Sean Fowlkes v. Michael Hanlon

Sean Fowlkes v. Michael Hanlon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 21, 2014

Sean Fowlkes v. Michael Hanlon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1533

SEAN DARNELL FOWLKES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL HANLON, Assistant United States Attorney, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:14-cv-01270-CCB)

Submitted: October 14, 2014 Decided: October 21, 2014

Before GREGORY and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean Darnell Fowlkes, Appellant Pro Se. Molissa Heather Farber, Victor Matthew Lawrence, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sean Darnell Fowlkes appeals the district court’s order finding that the defendant was entitled to absolute immunity and denying relief on Fowlkes’ complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Fowlkes v. Hanlon, No. 1:14-cv-01270-CCB (D. Md. May 12, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.