United States v. William Cross
United States v. William Cross
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6906
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)
Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 22, 2014
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions made under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) seeking a ruling on the court’s subject matter jurisdiction over his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D.
Va. filed June 2 & entered June 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.