U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Alonzo Greene v. Durham County Police Dep't

Alonzo Greene v. Durham County Police Dep't
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2014

Alonzo Greene v. Durham County Police Dep't

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6887

ALONZO GREENE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, sued in individual and official capacity; R.C. SWARTZ, Durham County police officer sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, #1(DPO), Police Investigator, sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, #2(DPO), Police Investigator, sued in individual and official capacity; JOHN DOE, DPO (Supervisor at scene), sued in individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00452-CCE-JEP)

Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 22, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alonzo Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Martin Rehberg, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Alonzo Greene appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as to one defendant and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Greene seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Greene’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.