Linwood Gray v. Howard Stern
Linwood Gray v. Howard Stern
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1562
LINWOOD GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOWARD L. STERN; SANDRA M. STERN, Defendants – Appellees, and PEOPLES BANK OF MARYLAND, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (8:13-cv-02219-CCB)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin Frederick, Daniel Russell Hodges, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Linwood Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v. Stern, No. 8:13-cv-02219-CCB (D. Md. May 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.