James Brawner v. Leroy Cartledge

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

James Brawner v. Leroy Cartledge

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6643

JAMES RANDALL BRAWNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LEROY CARTLEDGE, sued in his individual capacity; STEVEN LEWIS, sued in his individual capacity; J. PARKER, sued in his individual capacity; FRANK MURSIER, sued in his individual capacity; HARRISON, sued in his individual capacity; JAMES SLIGH, sued in his individual capacity; DENNIS PATTERSON, sued in his individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:12-cv-01889-RMG)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Randall Brawner, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Randall Brawner appeals the district court’s

order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant

Defendants’ summary judgment motion on Brawner’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint against them. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s judgment. See Brawner v. Cartledge, No. 5:12-

cv-01889-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished