James Brawner v. Leroy Cartledge
James Brawner v. Leroy Cartledge
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6643
JAMES RANDALL BRAWNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LEROY CARTLEDGE, sued in his individual capacity; STEVEN LEWIS, sued in his individual capacity; J. PARKER, sued in his individual capacity; FRANK MURSIER, sued in his individual capacity; HARRISON, sued in his individual capacity; JAMES SLIGH, sued in his individual capacity; DENNIS PATTERSON, sued in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:12-cv-01889-RMG)
Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Randall Brawner, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Randall Brawner appeals the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
Defendants’ summary judgment motion on Brawner’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint against them. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. See Brawner v. Cartledge, No. 5:12-
cv-01889-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished