Syed Kazmi v. JP Morgan Chase

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Syed Kazmi v. JP Morgan Chase

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1526

In Re: SYED AFTAB KAZMI,

Debtor.

---------------------------

SYED AFTAB KAZMI,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE; WELLS FARGO,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

GREEN POINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.; DEUTSCHE BANK; BANK OF AMERICA; BARCLAYS BANK, PLC; BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC.; LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES, INC.; LPS DEFAULT SOLUTIONS, INC.; DOCX LLC; DOES 1 THRU 50, et al.; GSR TRUST 2005-HEL-1,

Defendants,

and

JANET M. MEIBURGER,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge; Brian F. Kenney, Bankruptcy Judge. (1:14-cv- 00024-CMH-TRJ; 13-10897-BFK; 13-01087-BFK) Submitted: October 20, 2014 Decided: October 24, 2014

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Syed Aftab Kazmi, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Cameron Hicks, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Syed Aftab Kazmi appeals the district court’s order

affirming the backruptcy court’s orders granting summary

judgment in favor of Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. Kazmi v.

JPMorgan Chase, Nos. 1:14-cv-00024-CMH-TRJ; 13-10897-BFK; 13-

01087-BFK (E.D. Va. filed May 19, 2014, entered May 20, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished