Richard W. Mann v. European American Investment
Richard W. Mann v. European American Investment
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1503
RICHARD W. MANN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EUROPEAN AMERICAN INVESTMENT BANK AG,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00516-JAB-JLW)
Submitted: October 31, 2014 Decided: November 6, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond A. Knight, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Timothy G. Barber, Antonio E. Lewis, KING & SPALDING, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Richard W. Mann appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); Edwards v.
City of Goldsboro,
178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999)
(stating failure to comply with this rule constitutes
abandonment of appeal). None of the theories asserted in
Appellant’s brief were raised in his objections to the
magistrate judge’s recommendation. Therefore, Appellant has
waived appellate review of these arguments. United States v.
Midgette,
478 F.3d 616, 620-22(4th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished