Michael Goins v. Elbert Pearson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Michael Goins v. Elbert Pearson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6876

MICHAEL D. GOINS, a/k/a Michael Goins,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

INVESTIGATOR ELBERT PEARSON, in his individual and official capacity; SERGEANT C. LONG, in his individual and official capacity; CORPORAL COUNCIL, in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

MIRIAM COCCIOLONE; BERNARD MACKEY, in his individual and official capacity; JON OMZINT, in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:12-cv-03494-RMG)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: November 6, 2014

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael D. Goins, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Michael D. Goins appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Goins v. Pearson, No. 4:12-cv-03494-RMG (D.S.C. May 29,

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished