In re: Detrine Hudson v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Detrine Hudson v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1685

In Re: DETRINE HUDSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:13-cv-03075-RMG)

Submitted: November 17, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Detrine Hudson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Detrine Hudson has filed petitions for a writ of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed

processing a notice of appeal he filed in a

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) action. He seeks an order from this court directing the

district court to act. Our review of the district court’s

docket reveals that the district court docketed the notice of

appeal and forwarded it to this court. Accordingly, because the

district court has recently acted, we deny the mandamus

petitions as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished