In re: Detrine Hudson v.
In re: Detrine Hudson v.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1685
In Re: DETRINE HUDSON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:13-cv-03075-RMG)
Submitted: November 17, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Detrine Hudson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Detrine Hudson has filed petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed
processing a notice of appeal he filed in a
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) action. He seeks an order from this court directing the
district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court docketed the notice of
appeal and forwarded it to this court. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently acted, we deny the mandamus
petitions as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished