U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

In re: Detrine Hudson v.

In re: Detrine Hudson v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 20, 2014

In re: Detrine Hudson v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1685

In Re: DETRINE HUDSON, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (0:13-cv-03075-RMG)

Submitted: November 17, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Detrine Hudson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Detrine Hudson has filed petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed processing a notice of appeal he filed in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court docketed the notice of appeal and forwarded it to this court. Accordingly, because the district court has recently acted, we deny the mandamus petitions as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.