Christopher Julian v. USDA
Christopher Julian v. USDA
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1480
CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN; RENEE G. JULIAN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES RIGNEY, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer; RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager; WANDA JOHNSON, Virginia Agricultural Mediation Program Project Director; J. CALVIN PARRISH, USDA Farm Service Agency State Executive Director; JERRY L. KING, USDA National Appeals Division Hearing Officer; BARBARA MCLEAN; CHRIS P. BEYERHELM, USDA Farm Service Agency Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs; ROGER KLURFELD, USDA National Appeals Division Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-1925
CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN; RENEE G. JULIAN,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES RIGNEY, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer; RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI, USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager; WANDA JOHNSON, Virginia Agricultural Mediation Program Project Director; J. CALVIN PARRISH, USDA Farm Service Agency State Executive Director; JERRY L. KING, USDA National Appeals Division Hearing Officer; BARBARA MCLEAN; CHRIS P. BEYERHELM, USDA Farm Service Agency Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs; ROGER KLURFELD, USDA National Appeals Division Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher B. Julian; Renee G. Julian, Appellants Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Katherine Michelle DeCoster, Assistant Attorney General, Abingdon, Virginia; Rhodes Beahm Ritenour, Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Christopher B. Julian and Renee G. Julian appeal the
district court’s orders denying relief on their civil complaint
against the United States Department of Agriculture, seven
federal employees, and one state employee. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Julian v. U.S. Dep’t
of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2014;
Aug. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished