John Donohue v. George Hinkle
John Donohue v. George Hinkle
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6905
JOHN DONOHUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE HINKLE, Regional Administrator; RANDALL C. MATHENA, Warden, ROSP; T. RAIFORD, Counselor, and current Unit Manager at ROSP; L. MULLINS, Institutional Hearings Officer at ROSP; INGLE, C/O at ROSP, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:14-cv-00138-GEC-RSB)
Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014
Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Patrick Donohue, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Donohue appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Donohue v. Hinkle, No. 7:14-cv-00138-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.