Bryan Atwood v. CertainTeed Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bryan Atwood v. CertainTeed Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1407

BRYAN L. ATWOOD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Virginia,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-01006-CMH-JFA)

Submitted: November 7, 2014 Decided: December 9, 2014

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick D. Greco, GRECO & GRECO, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. M. Kelly Tillery, Sean P. McConnell, PEPPER & HAMILTON, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Matthew D. Foster, PEPPER & HAMILTON, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Brian L. Atwood appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment in favor of CertainTeed Corporation

and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) in his civil action claiming that

CertainTeed violated the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act and

breached the parties’ nondisclosure agreement. We have reviewed

the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Atwood v. CertainTeed Corp., No. 1:13-

cv-01006-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 5, 2014, entered Mar. 6,

2014; Apr. 4, 2014). Atwood’s motion to supplement the record

is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished