Bryan Atwood v. CertainTeed Corporation
Bryan Atwood v. CertainTeed Corporation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1407
BRYAN L. ATWOOD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-01006-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: November 7, 2014 Decided: December 9, 2014
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick D. Greco, GRECO & GRECO, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Appellant. M. Kelly Tillery, Sean P. McConnell, PEPPER & HAMILTON, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Matthew D. Foster, PEPPER & HAMILTON, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brian L. Atwood appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment in favor of CertainTeed Corporation
and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) in his civil action claiming that
CertainTeed violated the Virginia Uniform Trade Secrets Act and
breached the parties’ nondisclosure agreement. We have reviewed
the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Atwood v. CertainTeed Corp., No. 1:13-
cv-01006-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 5, 2014, entered Mar. 6,
2014; Apr. 4, 2014). Atwood’s motion to supplement the record
is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished