Eugene Holmes v. Dayna Causby
Eugene Holmes v. Dayna Causby
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2011
EUGENE T. HOLMES, a/k/a Eugene "Sherlock" Holmes,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAYNA CAUSBY, Director, Board of Elections; DANIEL C. AYSCUE, President, Alliance Bank & Trust; GREGORY MCINTYRE, Attorney; TIM MOORE; ROGER WOODARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00241-MR)
Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eugene T. Holmes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holmes does
not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district
court’s disposition but instead appears to raise new claims, he
has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished