Eugene Holmes v. Dayna Causby

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Eugene Holmes v. Dayna Causby

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2011

EUGENE T. HOLMES, a/k/a Eugene "Sherlock" Holmes,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAYNA CAUSBY, Director, Board of Elections; DANIEL C. AYSCUE, President, Alliance Bank & Trust; GREGORY MCINTYRE, Attorney; TIM MOORE; ROGER WOODARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00241-MR)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eugene T. Holmes appeals the district court’s order

dismissing as frivolous his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holmes does

not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district

court’s disposition but instead appears to raise new claims, he

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished