United States v. Darryle Robertson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Darryle Robertson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARRYLE EDWARD ROBERTSON, a/k/a Tiger

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00304-JFM-3)

Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryle Edward Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Schenning, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darryle Edward Robertson, Jr., seeks to appeal the

district court’s order rescinding the order granting his motion

for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order Robertson

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished