United States v. Rodney Mitchell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rodney Mitchell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7113

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODNEY ALEXANDER MITCHELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00286-JRS-2)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Alexander Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rodney Alexander Mitchell appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for modification of sentence,

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 3:11-cr-

00286-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished