U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Rodney Mitchell

United States v. Rodney Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2014

United States v. Rodney Mitchell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7113

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RODNEY ALEXANDER MITCHELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cr-00286-JRS-2)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Alexander Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Rodney Alexander Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 3:11-cr- 00286-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. June 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.