Kelso Wallace v. Bernadette Lamson
Kelso Wallace v. Bernadette Lamson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1863
KELSO DAVID WALLACE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BERNADETTE LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; DIANNA GUNTHER; LINDA BIRD, Supervisor DHCA; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-2274
KELSO DAVID WALLACE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BERNADETTE LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; DIANNA GUNTHER; LINDA BIRD, Supervisor DHCA; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-00866-PWG; 8:14-cv-02089-PWG) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelso David Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lowell Frederick, Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Kelso David Wallace
appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his
civil complaint and his complaint filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012). We have reviewed the records and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8:13-cv-00866-PWG
(D. Md. Mar. 11, 2014); Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8-14-cv-02089-PWG
(D. Md. Nov. 7, 2014). We deny Wallace’s motion for appointment
of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished