Kelso Wallace v. Bernadette Lamson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kelso Wallace v. Bernadette Lamson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1863

KELSO DAVID WALLACE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BERNADETTE LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; DIANNA GUNTHER; LINDA BIRD, Supervisor DHCA; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-2274

KELSO DAVID WALLACE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BERNADETTE LAMSON, Assistant County Attorney; DIANNA GUNTHER; LINDA BIRD, Supervisor DHCA; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND; MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:13-cv-00866-PWG; 8:14-cv-02089-PWG) Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelso David Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Lowell Frederick, Edward Barry Lattner, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Kelso David Wallace

appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on his

civil complaint and his complaint filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012). We have reviewed the records and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8:13-cv-00866-PWG

(D. Md. Mar. 11, 2014); Wallace v. Lamson, No. 8-14-cv-02089-PWG

(D. Md. Nov. 7, 2014). We deny Wallace’s motion for appointment

of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished