United States v. Phillip Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Phillip Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7340

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PHILLIP JAMES WILLIAMS, a/k/a D, a/k/a PJ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip James Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s

order denying his pro se Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion to compel

a substantial assistance reduction, as well as its order denying

Williams’ motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s orders. See United States v. Williams, No.

4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 (D.S.C. June 30, 2014, Aug. 18, 2014). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished