U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Muhammad v. Purdue

Muhammad v. Purdue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 2014 · Keenan, Motz, Thacker
551 F. App'x 75

Muhammad v. Purdue

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Purdue, No. 5:12-cv-00129-FPS-JSK, 2013 WL 4508870 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.