Cunningham v. Drew
Cunningham v. Drew
553 F. App'x 323
Cunningham v. Drew
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to void its earlier judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Wendt v. Leonard, 431 F.3d 410, 412-13 (4th Cir. 2005) (providing standard in Rule 60(b)(4) action). Accordingly, we affirm the challenged order. We dispense ■with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.