U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 18, 2014 · Davis, Duncan, Niemeyer
554 F. App'x 244

United States v. Williams

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Phillip James Williams appeals the district court’s judgment in a criminal case pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See United States v. Williams, 4:09-cr-00073-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 16, 2013); see also 18 U.S.C. *245§ 3582(c) (2012); United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286-87 (4th Cir. 2013); United States v. Fraley, 988 F.2d 4, 6-7 (4th Cir. 1993); Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.