U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Sewell v. Dore

Sewell v. Dore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 12, 2014 · Diaz, Duncan, Motz
560 F. App'x 212

Sewell v. Dore

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Dore, No. 8:12-cv-02889-AW (D.Md. Oct. 1, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.