U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Canterbury v. J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp.

Canterbury v. J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 2014 · Davis, King, Niemeyer
561 F. App'x 293

Counsel

Henry W. McLaughlin, III, Law Office of Henry McLaughlin, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jason C. Hicks, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Canterbury v. J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Canterbury appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that he validly exercised his right to rescission of a refinance credit transaction under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667f (2012), seeking enforcement of rescission, and seeking alteration of the timing of tender under TILA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.