U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Currence

United States v. Currence
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 27, 2014 · Gregory, Keenan, Wynn
562 F. App'x 165

United States v. Currence

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Currence, No. 3:05-cr-00231-JRS-l (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.