Hurt v. Flury
Hurt v. Flury
564 F. App'x 732
Hurt v. Flury
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Raymond D. Hurt appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurt v. Flury, No. 8:13-cv-00747-DKC, 2013 WL 5335711 (D.Md. Sept. 20, 2013). We deny his motion at appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.