Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP
Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP
566 F. App'x 264
Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished Per Curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pauline Rowl appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her federal civil rights suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP, No. 3:07-cv-00491-RJC-DLH, 2009 WL 187575 (WD.N.C. Jan. 23, 2009 & June 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.