U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP

Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 17, 2014 · Diaz, King, Shedd
566 F. App'x 264

Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished Per Curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pauline Rowl appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her federal civil rights suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Saintsing & Myers, LLP, No. 3:07-cv-00491-RJC-DLH, 2009 WL 187575 (WD.N.C. Jan. 23, 2009 & June 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*265fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.