Stone v. Scott
Stone v. Scott
575 F. App'x 193
Stone v. Scott
Opinion of the Court
Steve Cary Stone appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for want of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. Scott, No. 1:14-cv-00027-MRDLH, 2014 WL 508257 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.