U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Parks v. PetSmart

Parks v. PetSmart
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 1, 2014 · Gregory, King, Wilkinson
577 F. App'x 210

Parks v. PetSmart

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michele P. Parks appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parks v. PetSmart, No. 5:13-cv-00777-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.