Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Bostic
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Correa v. Caliber Bodyworks of Virginia, LLC (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2024)
- Hetrick Companies LLC v. IINK, Corp. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2024)
- Brathwaite v. Helm (District Court, D. Maryland 2023)
- Alston v. Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. (District Court, D. Maryland 2023)
- Bhattacharya v. Murray, Jr. (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2022)
- United States v. MEDCOM CAROLINAS INC. (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 2021)
- Dennis v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 2021)
- Brocious v. United States Steel Corporation (District Court, D. Maryland 2020)
- Bioiberica Nebraska, Inc. v. Nutramax Manufacturing, Inc. (District Court, D. Maryland 2019)
- Edmondson v. Eagle Nationwide Mortgage Company (District Court, D. Maryland 2019)
- Wilkins v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2017)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Clinchfield Coal Company petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Bostic, No. 13-0046-BLA (BRB Sept. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.