U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Hemphill v. Aramark Corp.

Hemphill v. Aramark Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2014
582 F. App'x 151

Counsel

Eric Hemphill, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J. Delany, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Hemphill v. Aramark Corp.

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Eric Hemphill appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hemphill v. Aramark Corp., No. 1:12-ev-01584-ELH, 2014 WL 1248296 (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2014; entered Mar. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.