U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Gordon v. Mullins

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2014

582 F. App'x 248

Counsel

Carl D. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se., John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Jason A. Czekalski v. Helen Hanks, New Hampshire Department of Corrections Commissioner; and James Daly, New Hampshire State Prison Chaplain (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2021)
Czekalski v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner (District Court, D. New Hampshire 2020)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Carl D. Gordon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gordon v. Mullins, No. 7:12-cv-00494-NKM-RSB, 2014 WL 1118199 (W.D.Va. Mar. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.