U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Bansal v. Montgomery County

Bansal v. Montgomery County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 5, 2014 · Gregory, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
583 F. App'x 106

Bansal v. Montgomery County

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Amar and Bina Bansal seek to appeal the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss the claims against Montgomery County, Maryland, and Officer Thomas Berry in the Bansals’ 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Bansals seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.