U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates

Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2014 · Motz, Thacker, Wynn
584 F. App'x 177

Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

H. Richard Austin appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(3) against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:13-cv-00877-BO, 2014 WL 1891419 (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.