Pizzuto v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Pizzuto v. Smith, 584 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2014)

Pizzuto v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol L. Gray Pizzuto appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Ac*182cordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pizzuto v. Smith, No. 5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. July 1, 2013 & May 22, 2014). We deny Pizzuto’s motion to file electronic media. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Carol L. Gray PIZZUTO v. Scott R. SMITH Keith C. Gamble Stephen M. Fowler D. Luke Furbee Officer S.A. Zimmerman Officer D.L. Robinson Honorable James P. Mazzone Honorable Arthur M. Recht Honorable Ronald E. Wilson Kenneth W. Blake Julie L. Kreefer Toni Vancamp, individually and collectively
Status
Published