Goynes v. Cavazos

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Goynes v. Cavazos, 584 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2014)

Goynes v. Cavazos

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven A. Goynes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goynes v. Cavazos, No. 2:13-cv-00542-AWA-LRL (E.D.Va. May 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Steven A. GOYNES v. Joel CAVAZOS, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity) Timothy Santos, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity) The City of Norfolk
Status
Published