Goynes v. Cavazos
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Steven A. Goynes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goynes v. Cavazos, No. 2:13-cv-00542-AWA-LRL (E.D.Va. May 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Steven A. GOYNES v. Joel CAVAZOS, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity) Timothy Santos, Police Officer (in his individual and official capacity) The City of Norfolk
- Status
- Published